Prior
to considering the AKROKERAMOS site specific recorded parameters for wave
wind data, it would be advisable for the reader to consider some key parameters
on evaluating a real sea's energy potential.
Description
of Sea States
Waves
are created by the transfer of energy from winds blowing over the sea.
The energy transferred depends on the wind speed, the distance over which
it interacts with the water and the duration of time for which it blows.
Waves once formed will continue to travel in the direction of their formation
after the wind dies or turns.
Linear
theory is currently used to study ocean waves. Sinusoidal waves can be
characterised by their height (crest to trough) H, distance between crests
(wavelength)
and time between crests (period) Tor
the frequency f = 1/T.
The wave speed is ,
longer waves move faster.
Real
waves are a mixture of heights, periods and directions so wave data analysis
requires a statistical approach. The local state of the sea can be described
by its spectrum
that represents the energy distribution within each band of frequency and
direction .
This spectrum in turn can be summarised by a small number of basic statistics,
usually height, period and direction. Significant wave height
(where
is the spectral moment of n-th order) is widely used. For wave energy purposes
the most appropriate mean period is the energy period:
Te
= m –1/m0
In
deep water the mean power or flux of energy per unit wave front in a sea
state is given by P = 0.49 Hs² Te
kW/m (Hs
in metres, Te
in seconds). Typical oceanic values of Te are in the range 5-15 seconds;
Hs
varies from 0 (flat calm) to around 15 metres (severe Atlantic storm),
with median values in the Atlantic of up to 2 metres in summer, 4 metres
in winter. The third crucial parameter is the principal direction of the
power flux. Often an oceanic sea state will include both locally generated
wind sea, whose principal direction should be that of the local wind, and
swell generated up to several days earlier by distant weather patterns,
which may have a quite different principal direction. In this case an adequate
summary of the sea state will require separate heights, periods and principal
directions of wind sea and (occasionally more than one) swell components.
For a more precise description one can add standard deviations of period
and direction for each component, or a numerical summary of the complete
directional spectrum.
Note
that for resource estimation the relevant quantity is usually the power
flux in a given direction. Even for the optimal direction, this net power
flux in deep water will on average be at best about 75% of the gross power
flux (Mollison and Pontes 1992); though in shallow water, where wave components
line up perpendicular to the depth contours, the two may be virtually equal.
The complete directional spectrum, or a good approximation to it (e.g.
the frequency spectrum S(f)
and mean direction ),
is usually more than is needed for studies of any one site, but is essential
if we are to use data for one offshore site to estimate the corresponding
inshore wave climate.
The
Variability of Wave Energy
In
order to describe fully the wave climate at a site, that is the long term
distribution of waves, we need to consider their variability over the whole
range of time scales, from an appropriate sampling interval short compared
with the wave period up to year-to-year variability and the even slower
scales of climatic change.
The
short-term variability of waves, over a few hours and a few tens of kilometers
(in the open deep sea), is well described as a Gaussian random process.
Thus
the wave to wave and group to group variation, which are crucial for modelling
the power take-off of devices, can be calculated with sufficient accuracy
from knowledge of basic sea state parameters and the shape of the spectrum.
For instance, 'groupiness' is associated with a spectrum which has only
a narrow range of periods, such as arises in swell from distant storms.
The
duration of a sea state is important for estimating extreme waves within
that state. The duration of weather systems is important in determining
the limits on forecasting, in particular forecasting calms when no power
is available
Year
to year variability is important, first of all, in order to confirm that
wave data covering a specific number of years (ten or at least five) are
representative of the long-term wave climate of the site considered. Moreover,
year to year and longer term climatic variability are especially important
for estimating the lifetime extremes which
a
device will experience.
Nearshore
and Coastal Wave Climates
The
offshore wave climate is approximately steady over distances of tens of
kilometres (Mediterranean, European continental shelf) to a few hundred
kilometers (North Atlantic). As the waves travel towards a coast through
waters of decreasing depth, interaction with the seabed (and currents)
may lead to major changes. Focussing, defocussing and sheltering also occur
in indented seafront zones due to wave shoreline interaction. Consequently
in the nearshore region (water depth 15-25m) or at the shoreline the wave
climate can vary significantly over distances of tens of meters (e.g. Pontes
and Pires 1992), the resource generally being lower compared with offshore
conditions.
Shallow
water phenomena can be usefully classified according to their characteristics
of maintaining energy or not. We can so distinguish between conservative
(or nondissipative) and dissipative phenomena.
Phenomena
in the first class have the effect of altering the spatial distribution
of wave energy and its distribution between frequency and directional components
in a spectrum. The main conservative processes include shoaling, refraction,
diffraction and certain types of reflection. The rapid increase in wave
height in very shallow waters due to shoaling often causes waves to break.
Refraction (due to water-depth variation or wave-current interaction) can
be an important positive factor for wave energy utilisation because remarkable
concentration of energy occur in specific areas (hot spots). Also
the
turning of the crests, which tend to become parallel to the bottom contours
in shallow water, is responsible for the decrease of directional spreading
of energy in the shoreline. Diffraction is almost always a negative factor
for the present purpose because it promotes the smoothing of the spatial
distribution of wave energy and spreads wave energy in the shadowed part
of obstacles (islands, promontories).
Dissipative
phenomena involve a reduction of the total amount of wave energy by converting
it into water turbulence, heat or motion of the seabed material. Wave breaking,
bottom friction, percolation and wave reflection from sloping or rough
surfaced structures belong to this category. Wave breaking is generally
the most important of the dissipative phenomena and determines to a great
extent the power that reaches the coast where the first generation of power
plants is being located. For the present purpose, account of wave breaking
should be taken under the viewpoint of energy dissipation as well as of
the very important forces that breaking or broken waves exert on the power
plant structure. The other dissipative phenomena are generally less important
but over wide continental platforms, such as off the Hebrides and in the
North Sea, energy loss by bottom friction (increasing with the travel distance)
can be quite important (Mollison 1983).
The
AKROKERAMOS site
The
evaluation of the site specific wave power, period and height spectra,
are of prime importance for any further design considerations, for both
power uptake and structural parameters. There are several steps in evaluating
available wave power, starting from collection of long term wave trend
data -usually for a period of at least 5 years, as to have a reliable profile.
Availability of wind trend records, could also contribute to a more thorough
evaluation.
The
theoretical basics in evaluating the Power Spectral Density function S(f)
from
a given set of sea recordings, are provided in (1) (excerpted from "Wave
Energy: a Design Challenge" by Ronald Shaw, courtesy Halsted Press).
Section
(2) provides a detailed group of monthly charts for wave data isopleths,
as per waveheight to wavelength division. A chart for recorded annual wind
data is also included.
Section
(3) is an integral wave & wind potential presentation, at a national
level. It is simply provided for demonstrative purposes, as to indicate
the type of work that may result after laborious evaluation of trend data.
Such cumulative resource energy mapping is necessary for strategic desing
on a national level.
Finally,
although the calculated power potential at AKROKERAMOS ranges in the very
moderate region of 5-10 KW/m, highly variable seasonally, it was considered
adequate for demonstration purposes. Certain aspects of seasonal variation
had to be taken into particular account when designing the Wave Energy
converter, as it will be recorded in the following chapters.
|
|
(1)
Characteristics of waves in real seas
-
Underlying
theoretical evaluation -
|
| |
|
(2)
AKROKERAMOS breakwater
-
Annual
wave charts -
|
| |
|
|
(3)
Wave/Wind Resource Distribution
-
National
Map -
|
 |
|
|